Faith Crisis vs. Constitutional Crisis

Constitutional Crisis or Faith Crisis?

The second Donald Trump administration has become a focal point of global discourse, particularly within the United States. From immigration detention and deportation to the DOGE’s executive agency audits and the withdrawal from international organizations deemed misaligned with American interests, the headlines are unrelenting. One narrative, however, stands apart: the Democratic Party’s response to these executive actions and the emerging concern over what some call a “Constitutional Crisis.”

To fully grasp this concept, we must revisit the United States' historical foundation and the principles upon which its Constitution was crafted.

The Constitution’s Silent Stance on Faith

The U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1787, outlines the federal government's structure and function without directly mentioning God. By contrast, the Declaration of Independence references God four times, invoking “Nature’s God,” the “Supreme Judge of the Universe,” and the “protection of Divine Providence.” This nuanced relationship between faith and governance was no accident—it reflected the diverse religious convictions among the founding states.

In fact, nine of the original thirteen colonies required officeholders to profess Christian faith, with most insisting on Protestant beliefs. Pennsylvania’s early Constitution, for instance, included a statement of belief in “Jesus Christ as my Lord and Savior.” The influence of Christian doctrine was woven into the legal framework through English common law, primarily shaped by Sir William Blackstone, a devout Christian whose commentaries emphasized moral accountability grounded in scripture.

Common Law and Biblical Principles

Three pillars of American common law—the presumption of innocence, due process, and trial by a jury of peers—find their roots in biblical doctrine. Leviticus 19 commands impartial justice, asserting that neither the rich nor the poor should receive preferential treatment. This principle underpins the ideal of “blind justice,” a cornerstone of Western legal tradition.

The biblical foundation extended beyond legal principles. Deuteronomy, for example, was the most frequently cited text in early American political writings, surpassing even the works of Enlightenment philosophers like John Locke and Montesquieu. Moses’ farewell address offered a blueprint for governance centered on moral accountability—an ideal the founders sought to emulate.

John Adams encapsulated this sentiment when he wrote that the Constitution was designed for a “moral and religious people” and would be “wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” The framers envisioned a system of self-governance that depended on shared ethical and spiritual values.

Constitutional Crisis or Faith Crisis?

Today’s concerns about a constitutional crisis often stem from a deeper, less recognized issue: a faith crisis. Though secular by design, the U.S. system of government emerged from a society deeply rooted in Judeo-Christian principles. Yet, contemporary political and social dynamics reflect a growing departure from these values.

The Constitution itself provides mechanisms—checks and balances—to resolve disputes between branches of government. Therefore, any allegations of executive overreach or legislative obstruction do not inherently signal a constitutional collapse. Instead, the unrest might stem from the erosion of the moral and ethical compass that once anchored the nation’s civic life.

The U.S. remains a nation with a Christian-majority population, but fewer citizens actively engage with the principles that shaped its institutions. As this gap widens, political discord intensifies, giving rise to perceptions of systemic failure. The challenge lies not in the Constitution’s design but in the collective moral foundation of its citizens.

The Path Forward

America’s founders crafted a framework resilient enough to endure political turbulence. However, its continued success hinges on a citizenry that upholds the principles of justice, integrity, and mutual respect. Reclaiming these values does not necessitate theocratic governance but rather a recognition of the ethical roots that sustain the republic.

Ultimately, what we face today may not be a constitutional crisis but a crisis of faith—a disconnection from the moral precepts that once unified a diverse and dynamic nation.

I hope this article inspires you. Thank you for subscribing and for helping me publish great articles every day. You are my inspiration and the reason I publish articles each day.